Mechanisms of Translational Control: From Eukaryotic Ribosome Scanning to Reinitiation

Reinitiation: A Regulatory Mechanism Beyond the Main ORF

This is particularly of interest in translational control when scanning resumes and translation begins again at a new downstream start codon after stopping at a particular site. This mechanism is common in mRNAs having short uORFs, from where ribosomes that terminate near the start of the main coding sequence still have some initiation factors for reinitiating U/A again. Several factors were identified to regulate the reinitiation efficiency, including the distance between the uORF stop codon and the downstream AUG, sequence element, and structure of the ribosomal.

Coveted in the assembly of viral genomes, reinitiation has a crucial role in synthesizing various proteins from a single mRNA strand. For example, where reinitiation events can change the infection rate of the cauliflower mosaic virus depending on the mutation of the translation sites for initiation, control of reinitiation sites dictates the viral replication and protein synthesis. Multiple initiation and termination codons can be present in close range, and the ribosomes therefore run multiple initiation and termination sequences in turn, thus raising the coding number for each mRNA.

Impact of Upstream AUGs and Non-Canonical Initiation Sites

It is also noteworthy that there are upstream AUG codons and non-canonical initiation sites to complicate the regulation of translation. Sometimes other AUG triplets that are present upstream of the primary start are masks used to control the availability of the main code sequence. These upstream sites may be targeted by ribosomes to generate alternative protein isoforms or truncated proteins that have different or are regulatory.

For instance, Schlossmann’s et al. work has indicated that the dictionary genetics, etc., and genomics The effectiveness of this shunting is determined by the context within which the upstream AUGs are located and the architecture of the 5’ UTR. This mechanism is particularly important during stress, when signaling pathways in a cell may alter the availability of initiation factors, leading to a regulation of translation from specific IRES sites.

Reinitiation in Viral Translation: Exploiting Host Machinery

Some viruses use the host cell’s translational machinery to its optimum to synthesize viral proteins, more of which are involved in leaky scanning and reinitiation. For example, the FMDV has two distinct initiation sites, due to which it synthesizes different protein isoforms that are necessary for its replication cycle. Access to these sites is differentially controlled by other nucleotide sequences that affect the binding of the ribosome and the relative concentration of the formed protein.

Furthermore, multiple genes can be coded in viral mRNA, as the genome of many of the known viruses consists of a single strand that may have more than one reading frame. This bicistronic organization could be problematic for the host translation machinery because the ribosome has to traverse through complicated mRNA structures and perform selective reinitiation steps to synthesize the required components of the virus. Such viral strategies revealed important information about potential antiviral sites that could prevent reinitiation or decrease the divergence in a ribosome scanning fidelity.

Translational Regulation by RNA-Binding Proteins and Initiation Factors

Therefore, the process of translational control is equally regulated by RNA-binding proteins and the initiation factors that bind to concrete sequences or motifs within the mRNA. Most of these proteins can either facilitate or modulate the ribosome binding process, affect scanner speed, or facilitate reinitiation. For example, for the recruitment of initiation factors such as eIF4G and eIF4A, it is essential for the melting secondary structures that the progress of the ribosome is hindered by. Regulatory proteins immobilized initiation factors, thus commanding translation factors into unique mRNAs during stress or development changes.

This, coupled with the fact that ribosomes, initiation factors, and RNA-binding proteins form a multifaceted interacting system, will offer an opportunity to constantly regulate translation rates to the requirements of the cell. Such fine-tuning is often required in stress responses where it is critical to drastically change the synthesis rates of certain proteins to counteract cell damage and re-establish normal functioning.

Applications and Therapeutic Implications

Knowledge of the different strategies of translational control provides hope for intervention in diseases associated with aberrant protein synthesis. Strategies that focus on certain steps in ribosome scanning or reinitiation can reveal how protein levels can be up or down-regulated in cancer, viral infections, and genetic disorders. For instance, regulating uORFs or preventing unauthorized reinitiation could return ‘normal’ to the translation machinery of oncogene-altered or virus-co-opted cells.

However, selective inhibition of certain initiation factors or selective alteration of the scanning behavior of the ribosome could open up possibilities of a selective translation ‘remodeling’ that would allow accurate control of protein synthesis without necessary changes at the level of transcription. This is an approach of great promise for diseases that rest on protein misfolding, aggregation, or overexpression—the neurodegenerative states primarily included.

Conclusion

Global regulation in eukaryotic cells involves a multitude of methods, including ribosome scanning and reinitiation and uORFs and RBPs. These processes make it possible for the cell to very quickly change its rate of protein synthesis due to the internal and external changes so that the cell remains functional and in homeostasis. Further investigation into these regulatory mechanisms will provide new targets for the development of treatments as well as ways to modulate translation for the treatment of a multitude of diseases. The unrelenting dissection of translational control remains a source of understanding the dynamics of protein synthesis and its relationship to essential life processes as well as human diseases.

References

1. Kozak, M., 1986. Influences of mRNA secondary structure on initiation by eukaryotic ribosomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 83(9), pp.2850-2854.
2. Clarke, B.E., Sangar, D.V., Burroughs, J.N., Newton, S.E., Carroll, A.R. and Rowlands, D.J., 1985. Two initiation sites for foot-and-mouth disease virus polyprotein in vivo. Journal of General Virology, 66(12), pp.2615-2626.
3. Sarkar, G., Pelletier, J., Bassel-Duby, R., Jayasuriya, A., Fields, B.N. and Sonenberg, N., 1985. Identification of a new polypeptide coded by reovirus gene S1. Journal of virology, 54(3), pp.720-725.
4. Persing, D.H., Varmus, H.E. and Ganem, D., 1985. A frameshift mutation in the pre-S region of the human hepatitis B virus genome allows production of surface antigen particles but eliminates binding to polymerized albumin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 82(10), pp.3440-3444.
5. Kozak, M., 1984. Selection of initiation sites by eucaryotic ribosomes: effect of inserting AUG triplets upstream from the coding sequence for preproinsulin. Nucleic acids research, 12(9), pp.3873-3893.
6. Dixon, L.K. and Hohn, T., 1984. Initiation of translation of the cauliflower mosaic virus genome from a polycistronic mRNA: evidence from deletion mutagenesis. The EMBO Journal, 3(12), pp.2731-2736.
7. Bellini, W.J., Englund, G., Rozenblatt, S., Arnheiter, H. and Richardson, C.D., 1985. Measles virus P gene codes for two proteins. Journal of virology, 53(3), pp.908-919.